The History of Best Pheromones

The pheromone-imbued tidbit in an odd expression of foreplay. If the suitor liked the scent (and the pheromones) of the apple, intimacy was sure to follow.
The History of Best Pheromones
Nineteenth-century French poet Charles Baudelaire posited that the soul resides in the erotic sweat. He had never heard of pheromones, but was he referring unknowingly to human chemical interaction and attraction? And what of the comment of French novelist Joris-Karl Huysmans, who claimed the odor emanating from a woman’s underarms “easily uncaged the animal in man.” Is this unleashing of raw passion really the work of invisible, odorless pheromones?
Of course, we can’t forget to mention the now-famous correspondence between Napoleon and his empress, Josephine. In one of his letters, Napoleon informs his beloved that he will be returning home in a few days. He signs off with this succinct request: Please, do not bathe. Napoleon understood that his lover’s powerful sexual perfume (perfume laced with pheromones, we now know) would have been lost with the interference of soap and water.Louis XIV, the French Sun King, stank horribly because he shunned baths, calling them unhealthy. Louis also chased smelly women. The smellier the woman, the more lustful Louis’s response. While the king’s pungent bouquet may have offended the sensitive noses of his court, he was in fact listening to and obeying his true human nature: By not bathing, Louis kept his pheromones concentrated on his skin. His attraction to unbathed women was probably stoked by the fact that they, too, didn’t wash off their sweat—and their pheromones—every day. Journalist Bill Moyers once asked mythology scholar Joseph Campbell the question, “Why do you think we fall in love with one person and not another?” Campbell’s response directs us once again to the possibility of pheromone-induced love: “It’s a very mysterious thing, that electric thing that happens, and then the agony that can follow. The troubadours celebrate the agony of love, the sickness the doctors cannot cure, the wounds that can be healed only by the weapon that delivered the wound.” Learn more about the best pheromones at http://indigenouspitch.org/best-pheromones-for-men/ and http://sundowndivers.org/?p=5.
How Best Pheromones Influence Women
In relation to the original question: “Just wondering if people here have a higher need then sex with pheromones?” I say yes: that the girl have nice breasts, does anal, dresses sexy for me in a wide variety of ways so my eyes don’t fixate so frantically on other eye candy walking down the street, does not act catty, realizes that I’m an artist and I am *required* to be fascinated by Ferraris and the beauty of young girls, and that she be proud of me and strokes my ego instead of plays little battles of the sexes. 
78% of first marriages break up, mostly initiated by the women, mostly because of pheromonal “conflict.” Is that love at work? What higher need$ do those women have? I think a man is much more likely to “fall in love” with a waitress than a women is to “fall in love” with a waiter, because evolution *had* to instill love (pair-bonding) in men more so than in women, or why else would we spend half our lives raising kids instead of being pickup artists. Oops. That *is* what we do. Learn more about best pheromones at http://pheromones-work.weebly.com/best-pheromone-colognes.html.

Pheromone Behavioural bioassays

A likely source of the queen’s trail pheromone are the tarsal glands which are located on the fifth tarsomere of each of her legs (Lensky and Slabezki, 1981). Each gland consists of a unicellular layer which surrounds and secretes into a sac-like cavity. The rate of secretion of these glands of a queen is thirteen times greater than those of workers. As the queen walks over the comb her foot pads deposit the clear oily secretion onto the comb surface.
Pheromone Behavioural bioassays
Various pheromone bioassays have been developed to determine the pheromones responsible for the attractiveness of queens to their workers, and for court formation within the hive. None is entirely satisfactory. Learn about pheromones for men at http://pheromones-work.weebly.com/home/pheromones-for-men-2015.
A live queen may continuously produce and emit some of her pheromone components; this is difficult to duplicate in a bioassay, especially when the material concerned is in very small quantities and is highly volatile. Furthermore, it must always be borne in mind that different bioassays may be sensitive to different behavioural responses. Nevertheless, much useful and interesting, if only suggestive, information has been obtained.
One test, initiated by Gary (l96la) and developed by Butler and Simpson (1965), compares the attractiveness of cages containing different natural or synthetic pheromone components. Small cages containing different test materials are arranged on the top of the combs of a colony and the number of bees clustering on each cage is recorded after a few minutes. Either a queenless or queenright colony can be used, and the cages can be placed over combs containing brood or stores. The hive roof is supported well above the cages so they are in a dark chamber free from extraneous air currents.
Results from this bioassay reflect the ability of the test materials to attract bees to their immediate vicinity. Usually the cages are double-walled so the workers cannot touch the contents; when this is so the test does not necessarily reflect the ability of the test material to retain bees that could make contact with it, or to release antennal Contact and licking. Simpson (1979) tried to overcome this difficulty by substituting the cages with small discs of blotting paper, treated with the material under test and arranged in a randomized Latin Square. Up to eight materials can be compared simultaneously. The bees can actually touch the discs and test materials and at intervals counts are made of bees whose heads are orientated toward them. Learn more about pheromones at http://ceicom.org/?p=118.
Bioassays that depend on worker bees being attracted from some distance toward the queen do not necessarily reflect behaviour in the colony where little or no long-distance movement toward the queen usually occurs. Neither do they seem to represent court formation, as the bees comprising a court.
Conclusion
Pheromones play an important role in human attraction as well as that of bees. If you are looking for perhaps the most powerful pheromones than you should check out Pherazone Ultra. You can find Pherazone at http://julesjacobs49.edublogs.org/2015/01/05/pherazone-review/. Pheromones are so important for human attraction that anyone not using them is missing out on a great opportunity.